U.S. to bomb moon on UFO witness John Lennon’s birthday

Jeff Peckman

Denver UFO Examiner

U.S. space agency NASA intends to bomb the moon on Oct. 9, John Lennon’s birthday. The destructive plan of NASA comes at a time when President Obama is trying to restore U.S. credibility and respect. Exopolitics expert Alfred Webre addressed the seriousness of this issue in his article “NASA moon bombing violates space law & may cause conflict with lunar ET/UFO civilizations”.

Lennon was famous throughout the world for his music and peace activism. Lesser known to many was his interest in the existence of extraterrestrial life and its visitations to earth. Lennon saw a UFO “flying saucer” outside the rooftop deck of his apartment in New York City August 23, 1974.

The late and phenomenal musical genius Michael Jackson also had a passionate interest in extraterrestrial life and a desire to someday do his famous ‘moonwalk’ on the moon. An entire chapter of Michael Luckman’s book “Alien Rock: The Rock ‘N’ Roll Extraterrestrial Connection” is dedicated to Michael Jackson. If Jackson were to be alive at the time of the moon bombing there’s no doubt it would have been greatly disturbing to him.

It’s not just Exopolitics experts like Webre, and deceased celebrity musicians that talked about extraterrestrial life. According to George Filer, during the Apollo landing, Neil Armstrong, the “first man on the moon” said, "They're here. They are right over there and look at the size of those ships. And, it is obvious they don't like us being here". Dr. Edgar Mitchell, the sixth man to walk on the moon, has been very vocal about ending the government cover-up of UFOs and extraterrestrial civilizations.

The moon bombing would result in a five-mile wide crater that could engulf most of Washington, D.C. ‘As you sow, so shall you reap’. If nothing else, maybe NASA will dig their own grave on the moon. Then their free reign and squandering of taxpayer money amidst allegations of fraud and waste will come to an end far away from intelligent, civilized society.

As more comes to light about the moon bombing, more questions arise as to the true purpose of such a destructive act. Some ask if the U.S. is declaring war on extraterrestrials to provoke a pre-emptive attack that will bolster sales in the global weapons industry. Or maybe the idea is about the U.S. going to ridiculous and expensive extremes to cover-up evidence that extraterrestrial intelligent life has been on the moon and has visited earth. Others suggest that illiegal secret projects related to extraterrestrial civilizations use up a big chunk of the estimated “$2.3 trillion in expenditures that can’t be accounted for” as previously mentioned by former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Time will tell but hopefully NASA will come to its senses before it's too late. The grassroots Denver ballot initiative to create and Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission is attempting to address issues like this from a local perspective but will not be on the ballot for a vote before the moon bombing.

For more info: www.extracampaign.org

Join the campaign to prevent Gary McKinnon's extradition to the U.S.

If you feel that Gary's treatment is an affront to justice, fill in the coupon on the Daily Mail Website and they will forward it to the Home Secretary.

To sign the Daily Mail Petition please Click Here.

You can also contact Home Secretary Alan Johnson, independently of the Daily Mail:

You can send an email public.enquiries@ homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk or a letter to:

Home Secretary
Rt Hon. Alan Johnson MP
c/o Direct Communications Unit
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London SW1P 4DF

Home Office Contact Us page

Do you feel that Gary's treatment is an affront to justice? Click Here to cast your vote

Help us support Gary McKinnon by clicking the Free Gary Banner Below

MARS FACE FOUND UNDER POLAR ICE CAP

Posted on Monday, March 16th, 2009
By Erik Van Datiken

FRANKFURT - German and American scientists have found a stone face under polar ice that’s identical to the stone face on Mars!

The mile-long monument also matches stone faces found on the moon, Venus and Neptune. And that suggests that the people or creatures who built them were capable of interplanetary travel over 500,000 years ago, when the images are believed to have been made.

“The faces were clearly made by the same hands. The challenge before us now is to find out who made them, and why.” Drs. Phillip Lentz and Dieter Horne discovered the stone face under 3,500 feet of polar ice while conducting a seismological survey of Antarctica in February. The monument’s features were recorded by an instrument that uses sound waves to map geological formations under the Earth’s surface.

And those features clearly mirror the helmeted, human face that America’s Viking probe photographed on Mars in 1976.

“Other probes photographed stone faces on the moon, Venus and Neptune between 1975 and 1989 and they are all the same,” said Dr. Lentz, who holds advanced degrees in geology, astronomy and physics. “The key question is whether the Antarctic face was the first monument or teh last,” he continued. “If it was the first, we can assume that a technologically advanced society existed on Earth 500,000 years ago and left to colonize space.”

“If it is the last monument, it seems likely that extraterrestrials visited Earth and might still be here today. It’s purely speculation,” he added. “But we humans may be descendents of those extraterrestrials.”

Drs. Lentz and Horne plan a second expedition to Antarctica next spring and hope to learn more about the massive monument at that time. It is also believed that NASA is planning an expedition of its own, possibly for the end of April.

“It will be years before we can get a man to Mars or Neptune to study the faces there,” said Dr. Lentz. “But this isn’t like the faces in space. This is in our own backyard. It is an opportunity that can’t be ignored.”

Source here

NASA *RARE* UFO footage from above earth

This footage is very rare and was hard to find, its from the live STS-48 NASA feed in 1991. If these are space debris, don't you think they are "going a little too fast" ? I mean, unless debris has a self-propelling device other than inertia.....and more importantly (watch the whole video and wait for the very last one)....if these are space debris, why, ( oh why!) most of them are going UP, and the very last one is going DOWN? Souldn't they all be orbiting around earth? Just wondering......comments most welcome.


NASA UFO Footage from Above Earth

NASA UFO Sighting Area 39 B Surveillance camera

Secret night vision surveillance reveals Fleet of UFO's at NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39 B

Why would NASA keep these tapes from the public eye?????

The you to YouTube Member : equalizer3412

UFO enthusiasts may sue NASA for fraud.

NASA the U.S. space agency, may want to brace itself for a flood of lawsuits in small claims courts. The idea was brought up at the recent International UFO Congress, and supporters will again promote it at the X-Conference next month.

Small claims courts, are similar to the ones seen on television show like the popular People's Court, are usually cases of neighbor disputes over minor property issues. Where citizens can file suit against another person, business, government, or other enitity for an amount not to exceed hundreds or thousands of dollars, depending on the state or county, Attorneys are not allowed for either the plaintiff or defendant.

To read more on this please visit : Oh My Gov

Thank you to Kirkster for the link to this.

Are You Out There, ET? Searches for Habitable Planets Are About to Get a Boost

UP, UP AND AWAY: The Kepler satellite, scheduled to take flight March 6, is lifted for attachment to its launch rocket at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. Kepler will look for Earth-like planets that may be hospitable to life.
NASA

Next week brings a milestone in the search for extraterrestrial life with the scheduled launch Friday of NASA's Kepler satellite. The mission, named for 16th- and 17th-century German astronomer Johannes Kepler, will study a group of stars for three-plus years in search of subtle, periodic dips in stellar brightness—the telltale signs of planetary orbits. Although more than 300 planets outside the solar system have already been found using this method, among other techniques, Kepler's strength will lie in its instruments' sensitivity to smaller, cooler planets more hospitable to life and more like our own.

In a new book, planetary scientist Alan Boss, who studies stellar and planetary formation at the Carnegie Institution of Washington and is a member of the Kepler scientific team, argues that the mission should throw open the door to finding life outside the solar system. With any luck, Boss says, Kepler should indicate that billions of habitable planets exist in our galaxy alone, with an almost unfathomable tally of sextillions across the entire universe. (Where are Jules Verne and H. G. Wells when you need them?) We spoke to Boss about the thesis of his book.


[An edited transcript of the interview follows.]

Your new book is called The Crowded Universe. What does the title mean?
The point of the book is to show why one can claim that the universe is likely to be teeming with life. I make the argument throughout the book that we already know that Earths are likely to be incredibly common—every solar-type star probably has a few Earth-like planets, or something very close to it. To my mind, at least, if one has so many habitable worlds sitting around for five billion or 10 billion years, it's almost inevitable that something's going to start growing on the majority of them.

If they've got water on them, and they've got some comets coming in dumping in some amino acids and other interesting prebiotic chemicals, how are you going to keep those things from growing some sort of life?

Life is so tenacious and willing to seek out a toehold anywhere it can, my feeling is that it is going to originate anywhere it has a chance. It may not necessarily be little creatures like in a Steven Spielberg movie, but there will be some kind of archaealike or bacterialike microbes crawling around or bubbling along. Those are going to be creating output like oxygen and methane, and those are things we can see in the atmosphere. We may not be able to tell if a planet has intelligent life or dinosaurs, but we can at least tell if it has slime mold. So we're going for the slime mold.

Source: Scientific American

Structures on the Moon, signs Intelligence Life

NASA UFO *excuse*, 16th December, 2008

This is un-*bleepin*-believable......

NASA smudged photos of MOON BUILDINGS!

Please watch this video carefully. (Thanks Beth!)

Timbeeeer...on MARS??

Somehow these pictures leaked out to the public...(YEEY!) It is a long piece of cut timber that was captured by the Mars Rover's cameras. Who said there's nothing in Mars? Zoom in and notice the wheel tracks, maybe from the Mars Rover trying to get closer to get a better look ( I wonder where THOSE pics are...)

Where would a piece of timber this size come from? There are vast forests on More.. Mars, ones that are kept from the public. This piece of wood looks like it floated to its present location, being partially sunk in the soil. The ground around it is very interesting. Notice the flat rock formation of the soil and the crevices in between them. Does this look familiar? It appears to be the bed of a dried up pond. There had to be a significant amount of water in this area, water high enough to lift that railroad tie sized piece of timber and float is perhaps several miles. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter showed that vast regions of the Red Planet have been altered by floods. This dried pond effect should come as no surprise.

This flood had to have happened within the past thirty or forty years because the wood is intact, though this is judging the rate of decay by Earth standards. Some may say that Mars did have water on it long ago and that it even had an atmosphere, which is true, but a piece of timber isn’t going to survive for thousands of years.

Both of the Viking Orbiters filmed vast forests on Mars, though no subsequent probe to the Red Planet has shot a single frame of film showing a tree. This was by design. The Viking photographs show more than just a few trees but rather thousands upon thousand of them. These trees appear to be much larger than Earth trees, having a leaf and branch system that is unique to Mars. The foliage spans much wider than a similar plants on Earth do, rising to who knows what heights. The spacing between them could be the result of the dying Martian atmosphere. Dense forests more than likely filled large areas of Mars back in the days when it had a breathable environment. There were undoubtedly several species of trees, and different varieties of underbrush, which are now extinct.(..) (read more here )

The fact that trees can survive in such an atmosphere, and with much less water than Earth trees do, reveals their unique structure while offering hope for an increasingly polluted Earth. Since the Martian atmosphere is 95% carbon dioxide, these plants would have to thrive on it in a way much superior to Earth trees. They may give off oxygen, though I am using terrestrial vegetation for comparison, but they could give off another gas, one even toxic to humans. Seeding or drafting these trees in bulk could bring breathable air back to the Red Planet. If Mars was so altered by water, then where did all that water go? Some of it went into the soil, much of it is frozen at the poles, and a good percentage of it went into a lake. NASA didn’t need to spend all that money on the Phoenix Mission in order to search for water on Mars. All they had to do was look at their old photographs.

The only way that piece of timber got to where it was is by way of flood, and the only way that it separated from the tree that it was once a part of was by high and rapidly flowing water. Based on the findings of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, that piece of wood could’ve floated for some distance before coming to its final resting place.

The lake, although frozen, Mars having a mean surface temperature of -46 degrees C, must contain more than just water. There has to be some amebas and other single celled organisms in these waters. There are most likely fossils of Martian fish and perhaps even Martian animals. On Earth, old lake beds are a prime location in which to find dinosaur fossils. Why would Mars be any different?

If you examine the lake carefully, especially toward the right angle, you will notice two indentations. One is large and shallow while the other one, which is located near the right edge of the lake, is small but much deeper. These are due to the lake shifting as the result of temperature fluctuations.

NASA can keep telling its lies but the photos have slipped out and what a story they tell. NASA thought that the Opportunity Rover took a picture of the area in front of it, but did they honestly expect us to forget about the railroad sized piece of timber in the foreground? It’s time for NASA to come clean with the public. It’s time that they land one of those rovers in Cydonia, the Inca city, or in one of the forests.

Here is the original NASA link:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040524a/site_B115_navcam_180_cyl_L-B118R1.jpg

And here is the photo, in case it "dissapears" from Nasa's link:
http://i35.tinypic.com/2nlraxw.jpg

There's more below from different angles:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_n115.html

If you don't think these are UFOs, then come tell me what they are.

And don't tell me these are rocks, ice, debris...... Who wants to take a guess?

Stephen Hawking Predicts Discovery of Alien Life: But Will It be Carbon Based?

At an event marking the 50th anniversary of NASA, Stephen Hawking, Newton's heir as the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge, answered the question,

"Are we alone?"

His answer is short and simple; probably not!

Hawking presented three options. One, being that there is no life out there, and two – somewhat pessimistically, but subsequently, a little too realistic – being that when intelligent life gets smart enough to send signals in to space, it is also busying itself with making nuclear bombs.

Hawking, known not only for his sharp mind, but his sharp sense of humor, prefers option number three. "Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare," he quickly added: "Some would say it has yet to occur on earth."

Alien abductions, in Hawking’s view, are nothing more than claims made by “weirdos,” but we should be careful if we ever happen upon an alien. Because alien life may not have DNA like ours, Hawking warns

"Watch out if you would meet an alien. You could be infected with a disease with which you have no resistance."

Other prominent astrobiologists have warned that we humans may be blinded by our familiarity with carbon and Earth-like conditions. In other words, what we’re looking for may not even lie in our version of a “sweet spot”. After all, even here on Earth, one species “sweet spot” is another’s species worst nightmare. In any case, it is not beyond the realm of feasibility that our first encounter with extraterrestrial life will not be a solely carbon-based occasion.

Alternative biochemists speculate that there are several atoms and solvents that could potentially spawn life. Because carbon has worked for the conditions on Earth, we speculate that the same must be true throughout the universe. In reality, there are many elements that could potentially do the trick. Even counter-intuitive elements such as arsenic may be capable of supporting life under the right conditions. Even on Earth some marine algae incorporate arsenic into complex organic molecules such as arsenosugars and arsenobetaines. Several other small life forms use arsenic to generate energy and facilitate growth. Chlorine and sulfur are also possible elemental replacements for carbon. Sulfur is capably of forming long-chain molecules like carbon. Some terrestrial bacteria have already been discovered to survive on sulfur rather than oxygen, by reducing sulfur to hydrogen sulfide.

Nitrogen and phosphorus could also potentially form biochemical molecules. Phosphorus is similar to carbon in that it can form long chain molecules on its own, which would conceivably allow for formation of complex macromolecules. When combined with nitrogen, it can create quite a wide range of molecules, including rings.

So what about water? Isn’t at least water essential to life? Not necessarily. Ammonia, for example, has many of the same properties as water. An ammonia or ammonia-water mixture stays liquid at much colder temperatures than plain water. Such biochemistries may exist outside the conventional water-based "habitability zone". One example of such a location would be right here in our own solar system on Saturn's largest moon Titan.

Hydrogen fluoride methanol, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride, and formamide have all been suggested as suitable solvents that could theoretically support alternative biochemistry. All of these “water replacements” have pros and cons when considered in our terrestrial environment. What needs to be considered is that with a radically different environment, comes radically different reactions. Water and carbon might be the very last things capable of supporting life in some extreme planetary conditions.

Posted by Josh Hill with Rebecca Sato.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/at-an-event-mar.html

Beam me up, Scotty! (by elevator?!?)

Competition heating up between Japan and the US to build the world's first "space elevator". The technology required to create a physical link between Earth and outer space is getting closer to being a reality with Japan's announcement that it was researching plans to build a space elevator – a link to space that could transport cargo and even tourists – for 1 trillion yen ($11 billion)

Just like travelling abroad, anyone will be able to ride the elevator into space,"

chairman of the Japan Space Elevator Association, Shuichi Ono, told The Times. The news is reported to have shaken up scientists at NASA, who have traditionally focused on rockets to reach space but could now be considering following Japan's suit.

The plans for a space elevator rely on a cable being stretched between a satellite and a platform on Earth along which vehicles could travel. One location being considered by NASA for such a platform is off the coast of Perth, according to the West Australian co-author of the book "Leaving The Earth By Space Elevator," by Philip Ragan.

Mr Ragan, who wrote the book with former NASA scientist and space elevator expert Dr Bradley C. Edwards, said there were 12 criteria that had to be met when choosing a possible location for the Earth port including consideration of storms and lightning.

"We identified that the Indian Ocean, about 500km off of Perth, was a prime location to site the Earth end of the cable," Mr Ragan said.

"A second preferred location is about 2000 miles (3218km) south of Hawaii... (which would be) closer for Americans in air time but logistically more remote for servicing by shipping."

"The Indian Ocean off Western Australia has been identified as an ideal location for a space elevator – a thin carbon nanotube connecting a barge to a space station, along which supplies could be carried up," said the report.

If a space elevator was built, it would provide a method of transportation to a space platform floating about 36,000km or more above the Earth.

Much of the cost associated with space exploration stem from trying to get off Earth itself – by overcoming the planet's gravitational pull using extremely expensive rocket blasts. Space Missions launched from a platform already outside of the Earth's atmosphere would be cheaper and more efficient, allowing for more exploration projects.

However plans for a space elevator rely on finding a material strong enough to form the cable, or "ribbon", stretched between Earth and space. Scientists say the ribbon would need to be 150 times stronger than steel to be stable. The loads are enormous and get dangerously high once the elevator starts oscillating as it moves along the cable. A major challenge is to develop fibers that have sufficient strength-to-weight ratio so that they will take the load without being so ridiculously large in diameter that it could never be deployed, which is why everyone is looking at nanofibre technology."

Experts say competition between space agencies would heat up in coming years as the technology to build a space elevator became available and the cost efficiency of launching missions from outside the Earth's gravitational pull became clear. The first country to deploy a space elevator will have a 95 per cent cost advantage and could potentially control all space activities.

Posted by Casey Kazan.

Source: http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,25642,24662622-5014239,00.html

Beams of light also revealed on NASA footage! Are "they" probing us?

This post reveals something similar, but this time based on NASA footage, to what happened a couple of days ago in Bristol, UK (see post http://22050hz.blogspot.com/2008/11/red-beam-shoots-to-ground-from-ufo-over.html) when red beams of light came shooting down from UFO sightings. These videos below are a MUST SEE. Please comment.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

President Elect Obama appears to have very little interest in UFOs or outer space

President Elect Obama appears to have very little interest in UFOs or outer space. During a news flap over statements made by Shirley MacLaine last year about a UFO sighting that former Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich had, a number of other Democratic Candidates were asked how they felt about UFOs. Barack Obama told the late Tim Russert of NBC News that he was more concerned about improving the quality of people’s lives here on Earth, than space aliens.
Obviously preferring to focus his attention on solving the terrestrial economic problems of U.S. Citizens, Barack Obama has also sent strong signals to NASA that he has little interest in spending billions of tax dollars on space exploration. He stood with Florida Senator and former Astronaut Bill Nelson at the Kennedy Space Center this past summer to declare that although he would support continued “basic research and development” at NASA over the long term, he would need to find ways to pay for it that would not take money away from programs that help people here on Earth in the short term.
Obama and many other democrats believe that promises made by President Bush regarding future NASA programs involving the Moon and Mars have always been strong on rhetoric and short on funding. Unlike the funded mandate outlined in his famous “We shall go to the Moon…” speech that the late President John F. Kennedy delivered to NASA’s doorstep, the most that Bush and the various incarnations of the U.S. Congress that have existed during his Administration have done is sent the space agency a few dollars to develop vehicles needed to get to those places.
Apart from the fact that big money for space programs has been a hard sell even during the best of economic times in recent years, it’s doubtful that President Elect Obama will be motivated to do much more than just keep the lights on at NASA and allow current plans for the International Space Station to go forward as long as they don’t require too much funding. The real question is what will happen after he is sworn in as the forty-forth President of the United States.
I don’t imagine that there were too many Champaign corks popping at the Pentagon after Obama won the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. President Elect Obama is known to prefer diplomacy to military solutions. Whether he will go as far as former President Jimmy Carter did by trying to dismantle the CIA and cut military spending by billions when he got into office remains to be seen. What does seem to be certain is that not all U.S. Presidents receive the real E.T. briefing. Carter tried to get it from former CIA Director George H. Bush before he replaced Bush with a new director, but was turned down.
Times have changed and it’s entirely possible that Obama will receive a briefing about UFOs and Aliens whether anyone in the military or intelligence gathering community wants him to have it or not. Given the number of UFOs seen worldwide over the past few years and the obvious military responses in the form of jet and helicopter chases, Obama may have to simply join a show already in progress. If that happens, look for the tell-tale changes in Obama’s attitude towards UFOs, Aliens or Space Programs. A sudden and unexpected dependency on the military, a lack of interest in cutting their budget and overall adjustment of his political views may be one sign, but probably not the biggest.
I would expect a world-minded politician like Barack Obama to support UFO disclosure given the diplomatic and international relations possibilities such a move would offer our nation. Especially if he was convinced that extraterrestrials were really visiting our planet and impacting worldwide economies and technologies. Knowing that he could not affect change overnight, Obama might consider supporting disclosure with the hope that he could force the ultimate unveiling of alternative energy sources and new energy efficient technologies that have may have been developed as a result of captured or bartered UFO technology.
Several staff members working for movers and shakers in the Democratic Party have already claimed that some sort of ‘summit’ took place shortly after the Dennis Kucinich UFO affair last year to discuss how the Party faithful would react to UFO incidents in the future. However, most of these Party players probably do not have the clout needed to find out what’s really happening with ET’s and our government. Their responses would merely offer preplanned, politically correct lip service to the subject and Obama doesn’t seem to be interested in that.
As President, Barack Obama’s disinterest in UFOs may serve him better than Bill Clinton’s interest in the subject. Bill and Hilary went out of their way to dig up information about extraterrestrials and the government during their time in the White House. The result was lackluster at best. Military members sent them serve serving reports and briefing statements indicating that there was nothing to the Roswell UFO incident and political cronies were stonewalled at every turn as their tried to unravel the UFO mystery from inside the Oval Office.
I think it’s possible that some UFO insiders in the government may look at President Elect Obama as a sort of ‘clean slate’ type of politician given his statements about change. At best, they will trust him with the UFO secret and look for him to promote disclosure and provide positive leadership in that direction. At worst, they’ll tell him their own version of the E.T. story and use his ability to sway public opinion to maintain control over all things extraterrestrial.

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=10633